Definitions

miù (bound form) false; erroneous; absurd; mu (Greek letter Μ, μ)

Etymology phono-semantic

speech

Semantic: Phonetic:

About

The character 谬, whose traditional form is 謬, originates from a semantic-phonetic composition where the semantic component 言 (speech, language) is combined with the phonetic component 翏, which also carried a connotation of something being thin, slight, or deviating. This structure points to its core historical meaning pertaining to speech or language that is erroneous, inappropriate, or deviates from what is correct or proper. Over time, while the character's association with verbal error remained, its application broadened to encompass any kind of fallacy, falsity, or mistake, whether in spoken words, written texts, or logical reasoning. The modern simplified form 谬 retains the core 言 component but streamlines the phonetic element, reflecting a common pattern of reducing complex graphical elements for ease of writing while preserving the original conceptual and phonetic intent.

Etymology Hide

Seal etymology image
Seal Shuowen (~100 AD)
Clerical etymology image
Clerical Western Han dynasty (202 BC-9 AD)
Clerical etymology image
Clerical Eastern Han dynasty (25-220 AD)
Traditional Modern
Simplified Modern

Example Sentences Hide

这是一个常见的误。

Zhè shì yī gè chángjiàn de miùwù.

This is a common error.

他的说法非常荒

Tā de shuōfǎ fēicháng huāngmiù.

His statement is very absurd.

不要传播这种荒的言论。

Bùyào chuánbō zhè zhǒng huāngmiù de yánlùn.

Do not spread this kind of absurd remark.

他的论误导了许多人。

Tā de miùlùn wùdǎole xǔduō rén.

His fallacy has misled many people.

这本书旨在纠正历史误。

Zhè běn shū zhǐ zài jiūzhèng lìshǐ miùwù.

This book aims to correct historical errors.

科学家们驳斥了那个荒的假设。

Kēxuéjiā men bóchìle nàgè huāngmiù de jiǎshè.

The scientists refuted that absurd hypothesis.

他的论证中存在逻辑误。

Tā de lùnzhèng zhōng cúnzài luójí miùwù.

There are logical fallacies in his argument.

尽管数据详实,但其结论仍源于误的推理。

Jǐnguǎn shùjù xiángshí, dàn qí jiélùn réng yuányú miùwù de tuīlǐ.

Although the data is detailed, its conclusion still stems from erroneous reasoning.